University Ranking
1. Development of University Ranking (a) Around 1900, in England, the publication of Where we get our best men? This study examined the background of the country' the most prominent and successful men of the time with particular reference to where each studied as a consequences providing the list of universities ranked by the number of alumni they could lay claim to (bewildering array of criteria) (b) In 1983, American's Best Colleges, US News and World Report - for the first time information about Undergraduate programs in American's higher education (C) 1993, Times Good Universities Guide was published in UK (d) In 1990 later, witnessed the diverse lists (e) 2003, Academic Ranking of World Universities released Shanghai Jaio Tang and (f) one year later Times Higher Education World Rankings
2. Anti - ranking debate, initiatives and even associations, To rank or not, standard setters, categories, fit with purpose
3. UNSECO, Education on the Move, Use and Misused of Rankings - In Paris May 16 to 17, 2011 (b) Ranking methodologies 2005 (c) World Class Universities 2007 & 2009
4. UNESCO acts as Natural broker of knowledge and as a clearing house of ideas -
5. Primary aim is to encourage the responsible development, transparent articulation, communication and dissemination of use of Universities and tables
6. Key questions (a) Methodologies consideration in Ranking (b) Merits and demerits of Ranking (c) what alternative instruments may complement
7. Chinese Dream of World Class Universities & Positioning of Chinese Universities
8. Quality of Education, Quality of Faculty and Research Output and per capita Performance (10-40-40-10) (alumni - award - HiCi - N&S - Pub - PCP)
9. Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences, Life and Agriculture Sciences, Clinical Medicine and Pharmacy, and Social Sciences.
10. Times Higher Education
11. Academic peer view 40, Citation per Academic 20, Academic Staff: Student Ratio 20, Proportion of International academic staff 5, Proportion of International Students 5, Employer review 5
12. Input - Recruitment & Staffing - Output
13. Who prepares the ranking - Government - Media - Agencies
14. Tertiary Eco-system
15. Teaching and Learning, Research, Knowledge transfer, International orientation, Regional engagement
16. T&L (Student Staff Ratio-Graduation Rate - Qualification of Academic), R (Publication, Income, Citation), KT (Funding, CPD Courses Offer, Start-up), IO (Staff, Student, Joint), Regional (Working in the Region, Internship, Joint)
17. Major Global Ranking 5 (a) ARWU (b) QS World University Ranking (c) Ranking Web of World Universities (d) Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers of World University (e) Times Higher Education
18. Institutional age, Principal study mode, Location / Campus, Enrollment Profile, Status (Private or Public)
1. Development of University Ranking (a) Around 1900, in England, the publication of Where we get our best men? This study examined the background of the country' the most prominent and successful men of the time with particular reference to where each studied as a consequences providing the list of universities ranked by the number of alumni they could lay claim to (bewildering array of criteria) (b) In 1983, American's Best Colleges, US News and World Report - for the first time information about Undergraduate programs in American's higher education (C) 1993, Times Good Universities Guide was published in UK (d) In 1990 later, witnessed the diverse lists (e) 2003, Academic Ranking of World Universities released Shanghai Jaio Tang and (f) one year later Times Higher Education World Rankings
2. Anti - ranking debate, initiatives and even associations, To rank or not, standard setters, categories, fit with purpose
3. UNSECO, Education on the Move, Use and Misused of Rankings - In Paris May 16 to 17, 2011 (b) Ranking methodologies 2005 (c) World Class Universities 2007 & 2009
4. UNESCO acts as Natural broker of knowledge and as a clearing house of ideas -
5. Primary aim is to encourage the responsible development, transparent articulation, communication and dissemination of use of Universities and tables
6. Key questions (a) Methodologies consideration in Ranking (b) Merits and demerits of Ranking (c) what alternative instruments may complement
7. Chinese Dream of World Class Universities & Positioning of Chinese Universities
8. Quality of Education, Quality of Faculty and Research Output and per capita Performance (10-40-40-10) (alumni - award - HiCi - N&S - Pub - PCP)
9. Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Engineering/Technology and Computer Sciences, Life and Agriculture Sciences, Clinical Medicine and Pharmacy, and Social Sciences.
10. Times Higher Education
11. Academic peer view 40, Citation per Academic 20, Academic Staff: Student Ratio 20, Proportion of International academic staff 5, Proportion of International Students 5, Employer review 5
12. Input - Recruitment & Staffing - Output
13. Who prepares the ranking - Government - Media - Agencies
14. Tertiary Eco-system
15. Teaching and Learning, Research, Knowledge transfer, International orientation, Regional engagement
16. T&L (Student Staff Ratio-Graduation Rate - Qualification of Academic), R (Publication, Income, Citation), KT (Funding, CPD Courses Offer, Start-up), IO (Staff, Student, Joint), Regional (Working in the Region, Internship, Joint)
17. Major Global Ranking 5 (a) ARWU (b) QS World University Ranking (c) Ranking Web of World Universities (d) Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers of World University (e) Times Higher Education
18. Institutional age, Principal study mode, Location / Campus, Enrollment Profile, Status (Private or Public)
No comments:
Post a Comment